24 features. Batch Traceability Batch Traceability to be Maintained Design and Development Inputs Product Design Inputs Manufacturing Process Input Special Features See ford Custom Requirements for Custom Symbols Design and Development Outputs Product Design Outputs Additional Support for C3P or Legacy Data System Compatibility with CAD Systems Ford is available via the output design of Manufacturing process Design and development review The organization must use GPDS (Global Product Development System) when reviewing the design and development phases of products. GPDS information is available through the Ford Supplier Portal (FSP), log in to the Ford Supplier Portal, and then access the Ford Supplier Learning Institute (FSLI) app. Product Development For Inverted Delta Parts ( ), designing suppliers must include Ford Engineering and Assembly/Manufacturing in GPDS stage design reviews, where applicable. To the extent possible, design vendors should include Ford Engineering and Ford Assembly and/or Manufacturing in design reviews for all Ford parts Design and Development Monitoring Design Verification The organization shall conduct a Design Verification (DV) to demonstrate compliance with relevant Ford Engineering requirements: List of Attribute Requirements (ARL) and System Design Specification (SDS). Design review methods must be documented with test results and submitted to Ford Product Engineering for approval. For organizations responsible for component-level design verification, the organization must have a documented Design Verification Plan and Report (DVP&R), which will be completed by September 24. August 2015 18 Any other request by Ford to declare the capacity of purchased parts states: For the appc and MPPC to be acceptable, appc and MPPC must meet or exceed the required capacity APW in a 5-day operating sample or MPW in 6-day operating samples. Staff completing the Capacity Analysis Report (CARs) must have completed the Capacity Analysis training provided through the Capacity Planners to review the Capacity Analysis training annually. When capacity analysis training is updated, capacity planners should repeat capacity planning training and re-register in the Capacity Provider Inventory Manufacturing Flow The organization must have evidence of lean manufacturing implementation plans, as defined in the following link and in the Q1 manufacturing site assessment.
Information about Ford`s lean manufacturing principles is available in the emergency plans The organization notifies the Ford receiving plant, buyer, and STA engineer within 24 hours of the organization`s production disruption. The nature of the problem must be communicated to Ford and immediate action must be taken to ensure ford`s product supply. Note: Production interruption is defined as the inability to reach the volume of production capacity specified by Ford. Additional references are listed as requirements in Section 4. Some hyperlinks in this document can only be accessed on FSP (Ford Supplier Portal) from organizations under contract with Ford Motor Company (usually Tier 1). Subordinate organizations that wish to obtain an ISO/TS registration may need to access the Ford Supplier Portal (FSP) via a Level 1. 6 August 2015 23 Compliance with requirements during the first production cycles and specification of measurement techniques and data collection requirements. Note: The production control plan can be used to demonstrate Phase 3 with STA compliance Pre-launch control plan data submission Suppliers who supply parts for Ford powertrain equipment must provide the Ford powertrain plant with pre-launch control plane data for all parts and according to Ford. Focus on prevention Process design and controls focus on prevention rather than detection and correction. Incoming inspection should be taken into account when developing control strategies to prevent the use of non-compliant raw materials. Post-treated product (ISO/TS cl) The repaired and/or revised product must be re-inspected in accordance with the control plan and/or documented procedures to ensure compliance with the specification. Supplier notification Change in monitoring of special features If the data from control charts and ES tests indicate a high degree of performance, the organization should require a revision of the testing and inspection requirements for parts with special properties (see glossary).
Ford Engineering and Supplier Technical Assistance`s approval of a revised control plan in accordance with the SREA process will approve the revision. Approval must be obtained prior to the implementation of the amendment. The same approach should be used to replace inspection/testing of the finished product with upstream controls. The organization must submit permit applications through the RES (Supplier Technical Approval Request). Control element ( ) Fasteners The following control shall be included in the control plan for fasteners which are control points: Analysis of materials Heat-treated parts Before the release of the metal from an identified rolling mill heat, a sample of at least one coil or bundle of wires, rods, strips or sheets of steel shall be analysed and tested in order to determine its compliance with the compositional specifications chemical and hardened hardness. From each additional coil or beam in heat, a sample shall be tested to determine the chemical composition or hardened hardness. The results must be documented and referenced to the steel supplier`s plant heat number. This requirement applies to both equipment purchased and equipment produced by the organization. Note: External material testing equipment must comply with the requirements set out in Section 0 of this document (Laboratory Requirements).
Material Analysis Non-Heat Treated Parts The identification of each coil or bundle of wires, rods, strips or steel sheets must be visually verified to determine whether the plant heat number complies with the steel supplier`s analysis document and applicable specifications. Each coil or beam must be tested for hardness and other applicable physical processes August 23, 2015 26 Any modification requires PPAP approval and authorization for functional testing or PPAP approval and a waiver of functional testing prior to shipment of production quantities. Request for Supplier Technical Approval (RESO) What the AERS represents An A RES represents only the plan for a proposed organizational manufacturing process or a change of sub-supplier. The PST must be approved before the organization implements the change. Approval of the PST cannot be conditional on the approval of a functional study. SREA Submission An SREA must be submitted to Ford by the organization and obtain approval before any changes to the manufacturing process initiated by the organization or initiated by suppliers are implemented at the level that affects the production process/equipment. An AERS must also be submitted and approved by sub-level suppliers not controlled by Ford before implementing a relocation/relocation. An PST can only be submitted after the first ppAP approval.
For more information about the processing steps, see. SREA for Spare Parts Change requests related to spare parts that are no longer used in Ford production must be processed through the Appropriate SREA Spare Part Gap FCSD process, which can be viewed on the Ford Supplier Portal. . . .
